By Peter Oborne
Last updated at 12:17 AM on 29th May 2010
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXGbUe9
There are very few people in public life with finer personal qualities than Iain Duncan Smith, the newly appointed Work and Pensions Secretary.
As Tory leader six years ago, he was reviled, humiliated, plotted against and finally betrayed by his own colleagues. Everybody would have understood and sympathised if he had quit politics.
But Iain Duncan Smith did not sulk. There were no bitter private briefings. He did not take the usual failed politician's route and enrich himself as a lobbyist, company director or after-dinner speaker. Nor did he write a self-indulgent, money-spinning memoir that seems almost obligatory these days for any politician who leaves office.
Duncan Smith, a former British soldier and the son of a wartime fighter pilot, just bashed on. He devoted himself to the study of what is perhaps the most perplexing and yet crucial issue that faces our country today.
The former Tory leader wanted to find the answer to two questions. Why, when Britain is more prosperous than at any time in our history, is there also so much poverty and deprivation? And, despite a prolonged period of peace and security, why are crime, homelessness, family breakdown and drug addiction reaching record levels?
Iain Duncan Smith set about his mission the hard way. He did not just listen to the bureaucrats, academics and other self-appointed experts on the Welfare State. In fact, he refused to accept the conventional wisdom that the system is so entrenched that it cannot be changed.
Instead, he went to see for himself the derelict inner-city housing estates. He talked at length to welfare officers, charity workers, single mothers, drug addicts, prostitutes and the unemployed.
This was hard, poorly paid and unglamorous work. But gradually Iain Duncan Smith made a shattering discovery.
It dawned on him that the truth was that our welfare state has been making the problem of unemployment and poverty worse, not better.
In financial terms, our benefits system, which costs £85 billion a year, may be generous. But it traps people in squalor and deprivation.
This is because the system is perversely structured so that there are no proper incentives for the unemployed to find a job. It means that someone who moves off the dole to a £15,000-a-year job may actually find themselves poorer because they lose some welfare entitlements.
As Duncan Smith said last week: 'A system originally designed to support the poorest in society is now trapping them in the very condition it was supposed to alleviate.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXJSOAm
It is this absurd system that successive governments have allowed to take root and which explains why immigrants (most of whom come from countries where welfare systems scarcely exist) have grabbed so many new British jobs over the past ten years.
It also explains the dreadful fact that our failed welfare state has produced something entirely new in British society: a pattern of long-term joblessness that now stretches through generations.
As a result, there are housing estates where neither young adults, their parents nor their grandparents have ever had a job. This, in turn, has produced a long-term culture of dependency on handouts from the State, often buttressed by people resorting to crime to obtain more money.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXMQ0Vt
For the past five years, Iain Duncan Smith has been a voice crying in the wilderness as he examined the causes of these social ills.
He set up the think-tank The Centre For Social Justice, which has produced numerous reports highlighting the scale of the problems and proposing ever more radical and daring solutions.
But Gordon Brown, both as Chancellor and then Prime Minister, would not listen.
Then two weeks ago, in an act of great courage, David Cameron made the momentous - some would say foolhardy - decision to bring Iain Duncan Smith into the heart of government as Work and Pensions Secretary, with the challenge to mend Britain's broken welfare system.
Duncan Smith will be in charge of a department that spends an astronomic £185 billion a year - well over 20 per cent of all government spending.
It is sobering to reflect that back in 1979, the year Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister, Britain's welfare bill was a mere £30 billion, a sixth of where it stands today even when adjusted for inflation.
Iain Duncan Smith has two main priorities - each awesome in size. The first is to repair the country's pension system. Until recently, the British used to be a famously prudent people with a well-entrenched culture of saving.
However, that good financial sense has been destroyed over the past decade, and replaced by an ill-advised craze for borrowing and a shameless dependence on state hand-outs.
Second, Duncan Smith must overhaul the benefits system so that it offers the jobless a route back to work rather trapping them in dependency for life (shockingly, a recent statistic has revealed that anyone who has been on invalidity benefit for more than two years is more likely to die than ever return to work).
And the present system, as devised by Gordon Brown, is complex, unwieldy and archaic. There are up to 50 types of benefits. Even those who administer this rotten system are frequently baffled by the way it works, let alone those the benefits are meant to help.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXP9PJv
Above all, though, Duncan Smith's task is to make work pay and to try to stop the poorest people in society being trapped in state-sponsored poverty.
But, of course, doing this will cost money because they will initially have to be allowed to keep their benefits after returning to work otherwise there would be no incentive to seek a job in the first place.
Also, the establishment of retraining courses will be expensive. At a time of financial stringency, getting the agreement of the cost- cutting Treasury will be very hard.
But Iain Duncan Smith is a very tough customer. Unlike most Cabinet ministers, he has no further personal ambition. He does not want to be Prime Minister. He cannot be bought off with a peerage. He cannot be blackmailed, threatened or bribed.
He has an open mind and is interested only in one thing: to give fresh hope and meaning to those people who have been doomed to poverty and hopelessness by Britain's sclerotic welfare state.
With these, he is uniquely placed to take on and, hopefully, win Whitehall battles that many would not even contemplate.
Others have tried to reform Britain's broken welfare state. In 1997, Tony Blair was determined to do so (initially asking Frank Field to 'think the unthinkable'), but lost his nerve. Thatcher had tried but even she failed dismally. Most old Whitehall curmudgeons reckon that Duncan Smith will fail, too.
For bear in mind it's not just the ugly battles with the Treasury that loom ahead. There's the adamantine Whitehall culture that automatically resists change of any kind.
Duncan Smith will also face bitter political opposition from those with a vested interest in the status quo. These include the Labour Party whose bedrock of support comes from the client state it has created and the Civil Service, many of whose jobs depend on the huge nationwide system which dispenses welfare.
Yet no Secretary of State has ever entered a new department as clearsighted or as well-briefed. He has studied the problems, which he has now been asked to solve, for more than five years. His ideas have been road-tested to destruction. His personal commitment cannot be doubted. If anyone can succeed, it is Iain Duncan Smith.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXSH5Wh
Cameron Facing a long summer of revolts
Having caved in to the Tory Party over his attempts to neuter the power of the backbench 1922 Committee last week, David Cameron now faces a very awkward task confronting a fresh revolt over the coalition proposal to increase the rate for Capital Gains Tax.
A second U-turn in a fortnight would make Cameron look weak. But the problem won't go away.
Next month's Budget will pave the way for the biggest and most unpleasant set of spending cuts since the end of the Second World War. Benefits will be slashed, civil servants' pay is set to be cut and big public works programmes cancelled.
In these very straitened circumstances, David Cameron risks creating splits in the coalition if he waters down the CGT reforms by extending special treatment to Tory voters with second homes and stocks and shares. As he has already remarked: 'We're all in this together.'
SOME may mock John Prescott following news that he has accepted a peerage - but I cannot join the chorus. John Prescott has served his party and his country loyally and can feel extremely proud of his time in office. The House of Lords is full of crooks and time-servers - but Prescott will not be one of them. Furthermore, if anyone has ever deserved a title, it is his long-suffering wife, Pauline.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXUx1dn
Comments (47)
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have been moderated in advance.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXXE3Yh
This article has given me a new perspective of what IDS is trying to achieve. I've read the headlines and it sounded like the same old Tory, 'flog'em, hang 'em, take away their benefits' type of thing but if there are to be incentives to make it worth while for someone to take on a 15k job, then this is an admirable policy. I believe that there are a lot less lazy people in this country than is reported. If we put ourselves in someone else's shoes and the only work available will leave you and your family worse off, you probably wouldn't do it to your children. The whole mess needs to be looked at from a different angle, so well done Mr Duncan-Smith and good luck.
- O Cromwell, Norfolk, 30/5/2010 04:56
Click to rate Rating 43
Report abuse
Clive, you stated that your sister only gets £80 per week.
Well if she is in receipt of Incapacity benefit or it's successor the Employment and Support Allowance, she may well be able to claim other benefits as well.
I know someone in a similar situation who claims Incapacity Benefit, Income Support and Housing Benefit that covers the Full rent on his flat. He also gets a full rebate on his Council Tax after claiming Council Tax Benefit.
There is a grey area that covers the first 6 months before the claim kicks in properly.
It may be worth you visiting the Citizens Advice Bureau to get some help. If what you are saying is correct and your sister has been claiming this benefit for more than 6 months, she is probably entitled more than what she gets now.
Some people claim every benefit under the sun, believe me, people know how to play the system!
- Graham Wharton, St. Albans uk, 30/5/2010 01:03
Click to rate Rating 11
Report abuse
Strangely enough Mr. Oborne, your article makes sense but it isn't rocket science on the part of Duncan Smith ! People as low as me in the food chain of this Green and Septic Isle have seen this - and commented on it - for the past 30 years or more. Nothing has ever been done apart from that self aggrandising creature Blair sacking Frank Field for daring to voice it.
I'm 63 - when I was a boy I could (and still can) tell you the name of a man in our street who was registered blind with the relevant benefits .......... and yet was captain of one of the pub darts teams ! And no, he didn't have a guide dog which was trained enough to bark the next "double" he required for a finish !
Smashing bloke though - and nice family ....... just mickey taking !
- David Hughes, Doncaster, 30/5/2010 00:49
Click to rate Rating 18
Report abuse
Good luck to him; with work comes self respect and pride; something that is very much lacking in this country of ours which is demoralised after so much marxist/socialist rule. I hope for everyones sake that he succeeds
- Dave, Cockermouth, 30/5/2010 00:41
Click to rate Rating 25
Report abuse
Perhaps the laws should be changed and EVERYONE told that unemployment and sickness benefits are only payable for ONE year, and are then subject to a full review!
After that period, non British people should not have the benefits re-instated - that is what happens in the rest of the EU, so why should we be different? We cannot afford it any more- we couldn't afford it at the time but just borrowed money to allow us to "afford" it.
OK, that might seem harsh, but WE ALL know people who are abusing the system and can (or do) find work (but don't declare it). I worked in the Benefits section for 5 years but the rules stopped us from cutting back!
We have little industry left thanks to earlier Governments (Maggie "helped" a lot with that!). We need to re-build an export industry that can make money - it's no good opening McDonalds and shopping centres - they do not manufacture anything that can be exported!
So Britain must be re-built from the bottom up!
- One foot in the Grave, Ramsgate, Kent, UK, 30/5/2010 00:03
Click to rate Rating 25
Report abuse
OK, So IDS has this wonderful plan, and you believe he will succeed, but surely, in any business venture people want to see proof...
Has he ever set up a welfare system in a nother country, reduced dramatically poverty and created near 100% employment, in that case give details...
Otherwise, what you are saying is that he has a good character, works hard, and is keen on doing the job, which at the end of the day will still be a trial and error social engineering programme...
Besides, Mr IDS keep giving different tunes when he talks to different audiences, to Daily Mail readers, he uses a tough tune, to Independent readers he uses a more gentle tune, and to the Guardian he uses a left of centre tune... this does not sound like the authentic politician you are advocting.
Please Peter, I know you are a staunch right wing columnist, but make an effort to be less dogmatic, and more objective in your reporting...
- Nabil H, London, UK, 29/5/2010 23:58
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1282374/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Mending-welfare-Britain.html#ixzz0pUXZfQlh
No comments:
Post a Comment